ASRock AM4 Rack X570D4U-2L2T

Product Information

Now a year later, I discovered after a prolonged power outage that drained my UPS and forced a restart (which completely failed) that the ATX power supply in my server was bad. Along the front are four bays for hot-swapping 3.5” or 2.5” SATA drives. This will go a long way for adding capacity while keeping the price down. Assuming you want to max out capacity on this guy, four bays isn’t enough. The good news is that there are three more internal 2.5” bays. These bays are fixed, not swappable, and they too are SATA. This gives users even more options for adding low-cost capacity ideally with 2.5” SSDs or slim HDDs if you must. SLOT5: PCIe4.0 * x1 [FCH] *Supports PCIe3.0 when using AMD Ryzen™ 5000, 4000 and 3000 G-Series Desktop Processors with Radeon™ Graphics Holes for CPU cooler meant the orientation of a Noctua Cooler had the fans blowing upwards rather than to the rear of the case)

Would it be worth the extra performance to submit a RMA to Provantage and get two KSM32ED8/16ME’s (dual rank version) instead? They cost almost exactly the same but they’re not on the QVL (although the 2666 mhz version (KSM26ED8/16ME) is). Ok, so this board is not perfect. I will start with what I believe to be a design flaw that I currently suffer through, but that may be a deal breaker for many prospect buyers. There is a fundamental and inherent layout and power delivery design incompatibility: you have three PCIe lanes that fight for space and electronics, and there are no ideal configurations to maximize the potential of this board. Each Sysbench VM is configured with three vDisks: one for boot (~92GB), one with the pre-built database (~447GB), and the third for the database under test (270GB). From a system resource perspective, we configured each VM with 16 vCPUs, 60GB of DRAM and leveraged the LSI Logic SAS SCSI controller.Whilst there seems to be a lot of bad points, I have managed to overcome all of them, with the exception of the RAM which I hope will be fixed with a BIOS update. I would prefer to have seen even a single USB 2.0 header on the board somewhere, especially on the IO panel, but that does not cause me major heartburn. So, everything has been running great with my Ryzen 5 5600X, 2 x 16GB ECC KSM32ES8/16ME (on QVL), and X570D4U-2L2T…but

This board draws power efficiently, idling with a GTX 1660 super, 4x enterprise SAS hard drives, 2x NVME drives, 2x SSDs, a Ryzen 5 1600, 2x fans, and a AIO CPU cooler at a mere 40 watts. Its chipset handles heat well: I have seen 0 meaningful throttling at hot-but-not-alarming temperatures. Populated with 64GB of fast 3200MT/s ECC DDR4 (Kingston p/n# KSM32ED8/32ME), 8C/16T Processor (Ryzen 7 2700), + Adaptec RAID Controller with it’s own dedicated DDR cache memory and SSD cach for hot data provides me with a balanced system. The dedicated RAID offloads the processor, so my system is well positioned to run multiple virtual machines. Regarding the FAN problem, I'm trying to set the Fans into a manual mode but no matter which value I enter, the spin with the same RPM ... . Fan settings -> fan mode -> Duty to 20 &"Fan control mode" to manual. Duty 20 and Duty 100 result in the same RPM for the 3 fans ->1200RPMLooking at performance, we used two SN850 SSDs to get a feel for the peak system capabilities. For our Application Workload Analysis, we did the testing a bit differently using only 2 VMs for SQL Server and then 4 VMs for Sysbench. SQL Server gave us an aggregate average latency of 2ms. For Sysbench we saw aggregate scores of 3,210 TPS, 36.5ms for average latency, and 264.5ms for worst-case scenario latency. I’ll look into a better LSI HBA option…open to recommendations as I can’t say I am very familiar with their line. That was supposed to read LSI 9207 by the way – sorry for the typo! Or maybe I just use a breakout cable on the second port of that card with SFF-8087 to SATA so I can pass through some SATA SSDs…not sure if there is a way to pass through NVME that way. This change of mind return policy is in addition to, and does not affect your rights under the Australian Consumer Law including any rights you may have in respect of faulty items. To return faulty items see our Returning Faulty Items policy.

These workloads offer a range of different testing profiles ranging from “four corners” tests, common database transfer size tests, as well as trace, captures from different VDI environments. All of these tests leverage the common vdBench workload generator, with a scripting engine to automate and capture results over a large compute testing cluster. This allows us to repeat the same workloads across a wide range of storage devices, including flash arrays and individual storage devices. The above usage scenario still leaves me with one available open-ended PCIe x4 slot for expansion, which is not bad at all. RAM will only run at 2133MHz despite using 3200Mhz modules. There are no BIOS settings to be able to adjustThis is a highly revised review. Originally, I was disappointed by this board due to problems that I was having... inconsistent boot experiences with some outright failures, the BMC not functioning (not taking an IP lease and appearing as an unknown device), and unreadable screen resolution and display problems. Quite awful.

In our worst-case scenario (99th-percentile) latency test we saw the server hit an aggregate of 264.5ms with individual VMs 249.2ms to 276.1ms.Our first local-storage application benchmark consists of a Percona MySQL OLTP database measured via SysBench. This test measures average TPS (Transactions Per Second), average latency, and average 99th percentile latency as well. System inventory does not show any data. It shows "Information Not Available". However, when I boot and enter the BIOS via remote control, the CPU as well as the installed RAM is detected correctly.